By John Umeh
Prominent Nigerian activist, lawyer and political commentator, Deji Adeyanju, has openly challenged Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to release any evidence she may have regarding allegations of sexual harassment involving Senate President Godswill Akpabio. His bold statement, which has since gained traction across social media platforms, urges the senator to take a decisive stand or refrain from further insinuations.
Adeyanju, known for his vocal stance on national issues, questioned Senator Natasha’s prolonged silence and lack of public disclosure after reportedly alluding to an inappropriate encounter with a high-ranking lawmaker. He insisted that if she truly possesses incriminating material against Akpabio, the time has come to bring it to light.
“Enough of the drama and suspense,” Adeyanju wrote. “If Senator Natasha has evidence of sexual harassment against Senate President Akpabio, she must stop delaying and release it. Nigerians deserve the truth. Anything less is an injustice to victims of abuse everywhere.”
His comments come in the wake of growing public speculation following Senator Natasha’s veiled comments and interviews, in which she appeared to hint at being mistreated or harassed within the upper legislative chamber. While she has not directly named Akpabio in her public statements, the insinuations have stirred political controversy and demands for clarity.
Adeyanju emphasized that such serious allegations cannot be left hanging in ambiguity, especially given the gravity of accusing a sitting Senate President of sexual misconduct. He warned that if there is no evidence forthcoming, the matter could be viewed as politically motivated slander, undermining genuine efforts to combat sexual harassment in public office.
“Bringing these claims into the public space and refusing to follow through with evidence does more harm than good,” he added. “It weaponizes trauma and weakens the fight for accountability.”
So far, Senator Natasha has yet to respond to Adeyanju’s challenge, leaving the public in suspense. Meanwhile, calls are mounting for transparency and due process. Civil society groups and political observers are urging both sides to act responsibly, either by releasing verifiable information or ceasing the circulation of unsubstantiated claims.
As this saga unfolds, it continues to highlight the complex intersection of politics, gender, and accountability in Nigeria’s democratic space—where the line between whistleblowing and political mudslinging remains critically thin.
