By Gloria Nosa
In a move that has stirred both praise and controversy, the U.S. Senate has officially confirmed Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer to a lifetime appointment as a federal judge, marking yet another significant moment in the former president’s enduring influence on the American judiciary.
The nominee, whose name had been closely associated with Trump during his presidency, was approved in a narrow Senate vote, reflecting sharp partisan divisions over his past political affiliations and perceived legal ideology. Despite pushback from Democrats and some legal watchdog groups, Republicans pushed through the confirmation, citing the nominee’s legal credentials, courtroom experience, and unwavering commitment to constitutional principles.
Critics of the appointment argue that the former Trump lawyer’s close personal and professional ties to the ex-president could pose a risk to judicial impartiality. Several senators raised concerns over his previous roles in controversial legal battles, particularly those tied to Trump’s personal and political interests. “This nomination is not about qualifications — it’s about loyalty,” one senator said during the debate.
Supporters, however, defended the nominee’s legal acumen and pointed to his decades-long experience in both private practice and public service. “He’s a skilled attorney, a constitutional originalist, and a fierce defender of the rule of law,” said one Republican senator. “This appointment is a win for American jurisprudence.”
The confirmation is seen as part of a broader effort by conservative lawmakers to shape the judiciary for generations to come, following the pattern established during Trump’s presidency when over 200 federal judges were appointed, including three to the Supreme Court.
With his swearing-in expected in the coming days, the newly confirmed judge will preside over cases in a key federal district, where decisions often have national implications. His appointment underscores how Trump-era figures continue to make their way into influential roles long after the former president left office.
As public reaction unfolds, legal analysts will be watching closely to see how the judge’s rulings reflect — or distance from — his politically charged past.
