By John Umeh
The ruling party has recently stirred controversy by rejecting the demand for automatic tickets for its aspirants ahead of the upcoming elections. This decision, announced by the party’s national leadership, has generated significant debate and dissent among members who expected preferential treatment due to their past service or loyalty.
Traditionally, several aspirants within the party anticipated automatic nomination, a practice seen by many as a reward for dedication and proven performance. However, the party leadership has taken a firm stance that all aspirants must undergo the standard screening and primary election process without exceptions. This move is intended to promote fairness, transparency, and internal democracy.
Despite the leadership’s stated goals, the rejection of automatic tickets has ignited tensions within the party ranks. Some aspirants and their supporters have expressed frustration and disappointment, accusing the leadership of sidelining loyal members in favor of political expediency. They argue that the automatic ticket policy was a long-standing arrangement that recognized the contributions of senior party members and helped maintain unity.
Political analysts suggest that this decision could either strengthen the party by encouraging a more competitive and merit-based selection process or deepen internal divisions if disgruntled aspirants decide to defect or undermine the party’s cohesion during the election period.
The party has reassured members that the screening process will be conducted fairly and that all aspirants will be given equal opportunity to secure nominations through transparent primaries. The leadership emphasized that the ultimate goal is to present the strongest candidates to the electorate to ensure victory in the forthcoming elections.
As the party prepares for the primaries, all eyes will be on how the aspirants respond to this policy shift and whether the party can successfully navigate this internal challenge without compromising its unity and electoral prospects.
