- Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger spoke at Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting on Saturday.
- The pair are set to discuss stocks, market speculation, the economy, and other subjects.
- The billionaire investors cautioned amateur investors against betting on fads.
Warren Buffett has kept an extremely low profile over the past year. He finally broke his silence at Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder meeting on Saturday, which was livestreamed by Yahoo Finance.
The famed investor and Berkshire CEO was joined by his company’s right-hand man, Charlie Munger, on the stage in Los Angeles on Saturday. Berkshire’s heads of insurance and non-insurance operations, Ajit Jain and Greg Abel, were also in attendance.
Some of the meeting’s highlights include Buffett saying that he potentially avoided having to bail out the “big four” US airlines by selling their stocks last year, and that he likely made a mistake when he trimmed his Apple stake and exited his Costco position last year.
Meanwhile, Munger said the professional investors and promoters encouraging amateurs to speculate and invest recklessly should be ashamed. He also slammed bitcoin as a “disgusting” development and dislikes that it’s gained traction.
Follow along for live updates as the meeting continues:
Buffett said that Berkshire’s businesses have done “really quiet well” in extraordinary circumstances.
The billionaire investor opened his presentation this year by highlighting how the biggest companies in the world change from decade to decade. He pointed out that investors and Wall Street were as sure of themselves in the 1980s as they are today, yet many of the era’s most successful companies have fallen by the wayside since then.
“Everybody’s starting something now where you can get money from people,” Buffett said, slamming the surge in speculative ventures aiming to capitalize on investor enthusiasm in recent months.
Taking cover during the market downturn in March 2020
“I’m the chief risk officer of Berkshire, that’s my job,” Buffett said. He pointed out that Berkshire sold 1% of its roughly $700 billion of businesses when the pandemic struck.
Buffett discussed the government bailout of the airlines last spring. He suggested that Berkshire, which boasts more than $130 billion in cash and short-term investments, might have had to foot the bill for helping the airlines if the company hadn’t sold its stakes.
“You’re looking at probably a different result than if we had kept our stock,” he said.
Selling bank stocks
“We didn’t like having as much money in banks as we had at the time,” Buffett said.
Why didn’t Berkshire use more of its cash during the crash?
Buffett has previously said he would never reduce Berkshire’s cash reserves below $20 billion, but appears to have raised that number significantly, estimating Berkshire could have spent $50 billion or $70 billion out of its roughly $130 billion in cash last year.
Buffett also commented on the Federal Reserve pumping liquidity into markets at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic last spring.
“They took a market where Berkshire couldn’t sell bonds a day before, and turned it into one where Carnival Cruise or whatever could sell them,” Buffett said. “It was as dramatic a move as you can imagine.”
“This economy right now, 85% of it is running in super-high gear,” Buffett said.
“We don’t want to depend on anybody,” the investor said. “You can’t depend on the kindness of friends if things really stop.”
“I give great credit on both the monetary and fiscal side to what was done,” Buffett said.
Munger also protested the idea that Berkshire could have bought at the bottom of the market last spring.
“That’s too tough a standard,” Munger said. “Anybody who expects that of Berkshire is really out of their mind.”
Is Berkshire happy to own Chevron given the ongoing backlash against oil and gas?
“People that are on the extremes of both sides are a little nuts,” Buffett said about the battle over the environmental impacts of the oil-and-gas industry.
Buffett said that the world will need hydrocarbons for at least the next few years, but climate-change concerns are real.
“I don’t like making the moral judgments on stocks,” he said, adding that he had no qualms about owning Chevron, which Berkshire added to its stock portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Why did Buffett recommend shareholders vote no on disclosing more about diversity and environmental impacts?
“It’s asinine frankly,” Buffett said about the proposal that all of Berkshire’s scores of businesses fill out reports on their diversity and climate-change progress. He argued that many of the shareholders who supported the motion haven’t read the company’s annual report or know much about its green initiatives.
Abel, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, touted his segment’s environmental credentials. He said the company has transformed how it does business and invested billions of dollars in renewable energy.
Why didn’t Berkshire sell Apple stock instead of buy more?
“Tim Cook is one of the best managers in the world and he’s got a product that people absolutely love,” Buffett said, highlighting how indispensable iPhones are to people’s lives.
Buffett suggested that if people had the choice between giving up their car or their iPhone, they would have a difficult choice on their hands.
“I sold some stock last year,” he said. “That was probably a mistake.”
Buffett revealed that Munger told him that Berkshire trimming its Apple stake and exiting its Costco position were bad moves. “I could only do so many things that I can get away with Charlie and I used them up between Costco and Apple.”
“He very likely was right in both circumstances.” Buffett added.
The investor also suggested that Cook has achieved some things that Apple cofounder Steve Jobs couldn’t have done.
The market boom
“Interest rates are to the value of assets what gravity is to matter,” Buffett said.
The investor pointed out that rock-bottom bond yields, combined with the appeal of “incredible companies” such as Apple, Alphabet, and Microsoft, have driven people to plow money into stocks and disregard their prices.
“Charlie and I consider it the most interesting movie by far we’ve ever seen, in terms of economics,” Buffett said.
Munger added that it’s clear more money can be pumped into the economy without major problems than anybody thought, but it can’t go on forever.
Buffett commented on special-purpose acquisition companies, saying the tidal wave of SPACs “is a killer.” He pointed out that there’s always been pressure from private equity companies, and the SPAC boom has worsened the rush to buy, as they have to return investors’ money unless they use it.
“SPACs have been working for a while. You stick a famous name on it and you can sell almost anything,” he said, describing it as an “exaggerated version” of what he’s seen in “gambling-type markets.”
“You have this incredible, huge asset to humanity but it really makes its money when people are doing stupid things,” Buffett said about markets. He highlighted the surge in people day trading, buying and selling options, and gambling on stocks.
“More people are entering the casino than are leaving everyday,” he said. “I creates its own reality for a while, and nobody tells you when the clock will strike 12 and it all turns to pumpkins and mice.”
“To some extent it’s a moral failing,” Munger said. “The easy made by SPACs and derivatives and so on, you push that to excess, it causes horrible problems for the civilization.”
“We have a lot to be ashamed of in current conditions,” Munger said. “It’s not just stupid, it’s shameful.”
Buffett said the amateur investors who are gambling aren’t shameful. Munger agreed that the professionals taking advantage of them are the problem.
Looking for bargains
“We’re used to shooting fish in a barrel but that’s gotten harder,” Munger said.
Buffett said that Berkshire has 10% to 15% more of its assets in cash than he would like, downplaying the need to deploy more of his company’s war chest.
The investor said that his company has $70 billion to $80 billion that “he would love to put to work,” but it’s difficult to use it shrewdly at current valuations.
Buffett declined to reveal which stocks he’s bought that he doesn’t have special insights into.
Munger said that critics of stock buybacks are “bonkers” if they’re against repurchases done right.
Asked about President Biden’s tax proposals, Buffett said that he doesn’t leave his politics at the door, but he refrains from speaking on behalf of Berkshire. He added that he’s not at all concerned about higher taxes.
Munger slammed critics of capitalism, saying that a capitalist economy has been key to American prosperity. “I’m a little wary of just constantly being mad at people because they have a little more money.”
Buffett’s right-hand man added that he believes it’s “stupid” for states to drive out rich people and lose out on their tax contributions.
“This isn’t the worst case, and yet what has happened is staggering,” Buffett said. He described the pandemic fallout as “one of the great human catastrophes of all time.”
“I will continue making mistakes,” Buffett said. Munger chimed in that the rest of the team will help on that front.
Buffett pointed out that Berkshire has evolved with the times, and its outdated and failed businesses have faded into the background over time.
Buffett cheekily dodged a question about whether he still sees cryptocurrencies as “worthless, digital gold.”
“We’ve probably got hundreds of thousands of people watching this that own bitcoin, and we’ve got two people short,” Buffett said. Angering the former group to make a couple of people happy wouldn’t be worth it, he added.
“Of course I hate the bitcoin success,” Munger said. “I don’t welcome a currency that’s so useful to kidnappers and extortionists, nor do I like just shuffling out a few extra billions and billions of dollars to somebody who just invented a new financial product out of thin air.
“The whole damn development is disgusting and contrary to the interests of civilization,” Munger added.
Would Berkshire insure Elon Musk’s mission to colonize Mars?
“No thank you, I pass,” Jain replied. Buffett said it would depend on the premium, and the rate would also depend on whether Musk was on board or not on board. “That’s called getting skin in the game.”
“In general I would be very concerned about writing an insurance policy where Elon Musk is on the other side,” Jain said.
“Tell Elon to call me and not Ajit,” Buffett quipped.